16 March 2012

human-like fossils...

Darren Curnoe and Ji Xueping studying the Longlin skull (Paul Tacon/LiveScience.com) A view of a skull from the Red Deer Cave (Darren Cunroe/LiveScience.com)

Mysterious humanlike fossils discovered

Scientists think they may have found a previously unknown species, in Chinese caves.

Surprising age of remains

Related links

Mysterious Chinese Fossils May Be New Human Species...


Mysterious fossils, of what may be a previously unknown type of human, were uncovered in caves in China, ones that possess a highly unusual mix of bygone and modern human features, scientists reveal.

Surprisingly, the fossils are only between 11,500 and 14,500 years old.

That means they would have shared the landscape with modern humans when China's earliest farmers were first appearing.

"These new fossils might be of a previously unknown species, one that survived until the very end of the ice age, around 11,000 years ago," said researcher Darren Curnoe, a palaeoanthropologist at the University of New South Wales in Australia.

"Alternatively, they might represent a very early, and previously unknown, migration of modern humans out of Africa, a population who may not have contributed, genetically, to currently living people," Curnoe added.

Skeletons

At least three fossil specimens were uncovered in 1989, by miners quarrying limestone at Maludong or Red Deer Cave, near the city of Mengzi, in southwest China.

They remained unstudied until 2008.

The scientists are calling them the "Red Deer Cave People," because they cooked extinct red deer in their namesake cave.

[Photos of the Red Deer Cave People]

"They clearly had a taste for venison, with evidence they cooked these large deer in the cave," Curnoe said.

Carbon dating, a technique that estimates the radioactive decay of carbon in samples of charcoal found with the fossils helped establish their age.

The charcoal also showed they knew how to use fire.

Stone artifacts found at the Maludong site also suggest they were toolmakers.

A Chinese geologist found a fourth partial skeleton, which looks very similar to the Maludong fossils, in a cave near the village of Longlin, in southwest China in 1979, while prospecting the area for oil.

It stayed encased in a block of rock, neglected in the basement of an archaeological research institute, until 2009, when the international team of scientists rediscovered the fossils.

"In 2009, when I was in China working with co-author Professor Ji Xueping, he showed me the block of rock that contained the skull," Curnoe recalled.

"After picking my own jaw up from the floor, we decided we had to make the remains a priority of our research."

Jutting jaws and flaring cheeks

The Stone Age fossils are unusual mosaics of modern and archaic human anatomical features, as well as previously unseen characteristics.

This makes them difficult to classify as either a new species or an unusual type of modern human.

For instance, the Red Deer Cave people had long, broad and tall frontal lobes, like modern humans.

These brain lobes are located immediately behind the forehead, linked with personality and behavior.

Red Deer Cave people differ from modern Homo sapiens in their prominent brow ridges, thick skull bones, flat upper faces with a broad nose, jutting jaws that lack a humanlike chin, brains moderate in size, by ice age human standards, large molar teeth, and primitively short parietal lobes — brain lobes at the top of the head associated with sensory data.

"These are primitive features, seen in our ancestors hundreds of thousands of years ago," Curnoe said.

[Learn About the Human Skeleton]

Unique features of the Red Deer Cave people seen neither in modern nor known archaic lineages of humans include a strongly curved forehead bone, very broad nose and eye sockets, and very flat cheeks that flare widely to the sides to make space for large chewing muscles.

In addition, the place where the lower jaw forms a joint with the base of the skull is unusually wide and deep.

All in all, the Red Deer Cave people are the youngest population found, anywhere in the world, whose anatomy does not comfortably fit within the range of modern humans, whether they be modern humans from 150 or 150,000 years ago, researchers note.

"In short, they're anatomically unique, among all members of the human evolutionary tree," Curnoe told LiveScience.

Mysterious population in Asia

The Red Deer Cave people lived in China at the end of the ice age.

"They survived the final, and one of the worst cold episodes, known as the Last Glacial Maximum, which ended around 20,000 years ago," Curnoe said.

"The period around 15,000 to 11,000 years ago, when they thrived in southwest China, is known as the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, and it saw a shift to climates and ecological communities the same as those of today," Curnoe adds.

"It also saw the demise of the megafaunain most places, including a giant deer exploited by the Red Deer Cave people, and recovered in large numbers from the Maludong site."

"This time also saw a major shift in the behavior of modern humans in southern China, who began to make pottery for food storage and to gather wild rice — this marks some of the first steps towards full-blown farming," Curnoe said.

"The Red Deer Cave people were sharing the landscape with these early pre-farming communities, but we have no idea yet how they may have interacted or whether they competed for resources."

[10 Things That Make Humans Special]

Although modern-day Asia contains more than half of the world's population, researchers still know little about humans there after our ancestors settled Eurasia about 70,000 years ago, Curnoe said.

No human fossils less than 100,000 years old had been found in mainland East Asia that resembled anything other than anatomically modern humans until now.

These new findings are fossil evidence this region may not have been devoid of our evolutionary cousins.

"The discovery of the Red Deer Cave People opens the next chapter in the latest stage of the human evolutionary story, the Asian chapter," Curnoe says.

"It's a story just beginning to be told."

Defining a human

A key reason scientists have not yet decided how to classify the Red Deer People, scientifically, has to do with one of the major ongoing questions for scientists investigating human evolution — "the lack of a satisfactory biological definition of our own species, Homo sapiens," Curnoe says.

"We still don't have one most of us agree upon."

"I think the evidence is slightly weighted towards the Red Deer Cave people representing a new evolutionary line," Curnoe said.

"First, their skulls are anatomically unique — they look very different from all modern humans, whether alive today or in Africa 150,000 years ago.

"Second, the very fact they persisted until almost 11,000 years ago, when we know very modern-looking people lived at the same time, immediately to the east and south, suggests they must have been isolated from them.

"We might infer from this isolation they either didn't interbreed or did so in a limited way."

Recent findings suggest other, different evolutionary lines may have also lived in the region, such as the "Hobbit", or Homo floresiensis, on the island of Flores in Indonesia.

"This paints an amazing picture of diversity, one we had no clue about until this last decade," Curnoe says.

The Red Deer Cave people might possibly even be related to a mysterious branch of humanity known as the Denisovans, only discovered in the past two years, whose DNA suggests they were neither like us nor Neanderthals.

"It is possible the Red Deer Cave people represent an interbreeding event, between modern humans and some other population, like the Denisovans," Curnoe said.

Ultimately, to see how closely or distantly related the Red Deer Cave people are to modern humans or even the Denisovans, scientists want to extract and test DNA from the fossils.

"We've had one attempt already, without success," Curnoe said.

"We'll just have to wait to see if we're successful in our future work."

The scientists detailed their findings online, 14 March, in the journal, PLoS ONE.

sign...



Thursday, March 15

thunks...



Thursday, March 15



Sunday, March 11



Monday, March 12




Tuesday, March 13




Wednesday, March 14



8 hrs ago



copy...



7 hrs ago

out. . .


Monday, March 12

ed's...

don't...



Wednesday, March 14

outraged...



Monday, March 12





Tuesday, March 13




Wednesday, March 14




Thursday, March 15




7 hrs ago



*

art who?



Sunday, March 11

bess pwace...


funny pictures - Cyoot Kitteh of teh Day: This.  Is.  The.  Life.


wrist action... fail!


Ta-Ta Thursdays: It Rubs The Lotion on Its Skin GIF -  Ta-Ta Thursdays: It Rubs The Lotion on Its Skin


cold...


funny dog pictures - It'll be a                                       cold day                                         in hell!


annoying...


sci fi fantasy Terra Nova - The Real Reason Dinosaurs Went Extinct


leaky linkedin...

LinkedIn headquarters (AP)

Why using LinkedIn can be risky

Hackers reveal how members can be tricked into giving up sensitive information.

A criminal’s dream tool

Related links

LinkedIn is a Hacker's Dream Tool...

SAN FRANCISCO -- If you use LinkedIn, you've probably told the site where you work, what you do, and who you work with.

That's a goldmine for hackers, who are increasingly savvy in using that kind of public -- but personal -- information, for pinpoint attacks.

It's called "spear phishing", and paid off last year in two especially high-profile security breaches: a Gmail attack that ensnared several top U.S. government officials, and a separate attack on RSA, whose SecurID authentication tokens are used by millions.

In both cases, attackers successfully tricked their targets into opening email attachments that appeared to come from trusted sources, or colleagues.

Investigators haven't disclosed how the attackers gathered information on their victims, but at RSA's security conference last month, the risks of social networking sites -- and LinkedIn (LNKD) in particular -- were a hot topic.

Dozens of presenters said the business networking site could be a potent weapon in the hacker toolkit.

"Businesspeople use LinkedIn for research purposes; headhunters and marketers use it to recruit.

"Why wouldn't Chinese intelligence agents use it as well, to spear phish?" asked security analyst, Ira Winkler, author of "Spies Among Us".

Most of the discussion about LinkedIn's risks was theoretical -- investigators say it's almost impossible to trace back the original source of personal data used in successful "social engineering" attacks.

In one arresting case study, self-described "hacker for hire", Ryan O'Horo, demonstrated how he used LinkedIn to get inside a client's corporate network.

[Related: 5 Degrees For Thriving Tech Careers]

O'Horo is a managing security consultant for IOActive, a services firm offering vulnerability testing.

His customer, a "high-profile company, with tens of thousands of employees", had so-called top-notch technical protections.

"We needed to go to the next level," O'Horo said of his efforts to crack its network.


A recent hacker forum posting (Courtesy: Imperva) O'Horo created a fake account on LinkedIn, posing as a company employee.

He stocked the profile with realistic details -- a plausible job history and skill set -- plus a few credibility-establishing flourishes, like a membership in a local hockey league.

From his dummy account, O'Horo sent out 300 connection requests to current company employees.

Sixty-six were accepted.

Next, O'Horo requested access to a private LinkedIn discussion forum the company's employees had created.

The group's moderators granted his request, without ever checking a company directory to confirm his identity.

"I had an audience of 1,000 company employees," O'Horo said.

"I posted a link to the group wall that purported to be a beta test sign-up page for a new project.

"In two days, I got 87 hits -- 40% from inside the corporate network."

O'Horo got caught just three days into his LinkedIn attack: An astute employee figured out he didn't belong, and blew the whistle.

O'Horo had already made his point, though.

"They were surprised the group existed," O'Horo said of his client's response to his report.

"It wasn't a formal company group; there was no oversight or policy covering that aspect of their social presence.

"People in charge of their information security didn't even know it was there."

Hackers don't need anything so fancy as private discussion forums to take advantage of LinkedIn.

The site's users openly display plenty of valuable data.

At last summer's DefCon security conference, a group of "social engineering" hackers staged a game in which contestants attempted to trick employees at more than a dozen major companies -- including Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500), AT&T (T, Fortune 500), Calmar (WMT, Fortune 500) and United Airlines (UAL, Fortune 500) -- into disclosing sensitive corporate information.

Next to Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), LinkedIn was the competitors' most widely used resource.

[Related: 4 Things Identity Thieves Don't Want You To Know]

Some people divulged specific technical information about their employer's infrastructure in their profiles, while others offered up details that could be used for stealth attacks.

For example: If you can learn the name of a target's colleagues, it's fairly easy to fake an email that appears to come from one of them.

LinkedIn says it urges users to think carefully about the information they choose to reveal.

"We recommend members connect only with people they know and trust," says company spokesman, Richard George.

"All Internet users should of course be aware there are bad guys out there who resort to things like phishing attacks, and people should use common sense, and tools available to them, to ensure they don't fall prey."

LinkedIn's vulnerability is inextricably tied to its growth.

The site has 150 million users -- almost twice as many as it had just a year ago.

As its database grows richer, its value increases, for both its members and those wishing to exploit them.

Security researcher, Rob Rachwald, regularly monitors the chatter on sites and chat rooms where hackers meet to swap tips.

LinkedIn's prominence there is rising, he says.

To illustrate the point, he pulled up a scattering of recent messages from one online hub, HackForums.net.

One posting solicited for someone to break into a target LinkedIn account, while others advertised "real LinkedIn connections" for sale.

"Hackers go where people go," says Rachwald, director of security strategy for software firm, Imperva.

"As Facebook grew, they went there.

"As LinkedIn grows, they're going there."


More from CNNMoney:

How they’ve hacked you
If you’re using ‘Password1’ change it. Now.
This remote controlled plane can hack you

dirty, lowdown, tom...



funny pictures - Cyoot Kitteh of teh Day: Mebbe One ob U Wuz Adawpted, Mebbe U Wuzn't...


chip...



sci fi fantasy Star Trek - Ask Me How I Feel About That


easy. . .



funny dog pictures - My philosophy?                                                That's easy.


really new...

New frog species discovered - in New York City...

Amazed biologists discovered a new species of frog in the jungle -- New York's concrete jungle.

The mottled green creature was, for years, mistaken as belonging to a widespread variety of the leopard frog.

Scientists now realize this is new.

"For a new species to go unrecognized, in this area, is amazing," UCLA biologist Brad Shaffer said Wednesday.

New York is surrounded by wetlands, and other nature-filled areas.

This latest urban creature appears to have chosen one of the grittiest corners as the center of its habitat: Yankee Stadium, in the Bronx.

In the journal, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Shaffer and other scientists compared the frog's DNA to other leopard frog species in the region.

They soon understood they were looking at a leopard frog... of a different kind.

"Many amphibians are secretive, and very hard to find, but these frogs are pretty obvious," said Shaffer.

"This shows, even in the largest city in the US, there are still new and important species, waiting to be discovered."

Lead paper author, Cathy Newman, now of Louisiana State University, was studying leopard frogs, when her colleague, Jeremy Feinberg, at Rutgers University, asked her to probe some "unusual frogs".

"There are northern and southern leopard frogs in that general area, so I was expecting to find one of those that, for some reason, had atypical behaviors, were hybrids, or both," Newman said.

"I was really surprised and excited once I started getting data back, strongly suggesting it was a new species.

It's a fascinating find in such a heavily urbanized area."

Feinberg said he'd been immediately curious.

This frog gave a repeated croak, not the "long snore" of other leopard frogs.

"When I first heard these frogs calling, it was so different, I knew something was very off," Feinberg said.

15 March 2012

fire the prick!

Majority of Americans Think Rush Limbaugh Should Be Fired For Sandra Fluke Comments: Poll...

14/03/2012

Rush Limbaugh

A majority of Americans think Rush Limbaugh should be fired for his comments about Sandra Fluke and contraception, according to a Bloomberg poll released Wednesday.

The poll is another piece of bad news for Limbaugh, who has not been able to shake the scandal he set off by calling Fluke a "slut" and a "prostitute".

It follows another poll on Tuesday which found only 29 percent of respondents thought his subsequent apology to Fluke was sincere.

It also comes as advertisers continue to pull out of his show.

The Bloomberg survey showed more than half of respondents saying Limbaugh should be fired "solely" for his comments about Fluke.

Men were almost evenly split 49-47 percent on the question, but women came down strongly for Limbaugh's dismissal, with 56 percent calling for his ouster, and 39 percent saying he should stay.

Moreover, almost a third of Republicans wanted him gone.

Limbaugh, for his part, continues to brush off the furor.

ALSO ON HUFFPOST: